Core i5-4570TE vs PRO A10-9700E

Intel

Core i5-4570TE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
VS
AMD

PRO A10-9700E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2016

Core i5-4570TE vs PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4570TE vs PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4570TE vs PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4570TE

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.9% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while PRO A10-9700E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $202 MSRP, while PRO A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-9700E

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (3,057 vs 3,085).
    • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4570TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-4570TE better than PRO A10-9700E?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-9700E is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4570TE pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4570TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-4570TE is the better buy right now. Core i5-4570TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $202 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A10-9700E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A10-9700E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    PRO A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i5-4570TE vs PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i5-4570TE

    The Core i5-4570TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,085 points. Launch price was $239.

    AMD

    PRO A10-9700E

    The PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,057 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-4570TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-9700E offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the PRO A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4570TE versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-9700E β€” a 5.9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700E (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-4570TE uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4570TE scores 3,085 against the PRO A10-9700E's 3,057 β€” a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-4570TE.

    FeatureCore i5-4570TEPRO A10-9700E
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    3.3 GHz
    3.5 GHz+6%
    Base Clock
    2.7 GHz
    3 GHz+11%
    L3 Cache
    4096 kB (total)
    β€”
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    2048 kB+700%
    Process
    22 nm-21%
    28 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
    Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019)
    PassMark
    3,085
    3,057
    Geekbench 6 Single
    966
    β€”
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-4570TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-9700E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-4570TEPRO A10-9700E
    Socket
    LGA1150
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    Yes
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4570TE) / not specified (PRO A10-9700E). The Core i5-4570TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the PRO A10-9700E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4570TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-4570TE rivals Embedded R-Series.

    FeatureCore i5-4570TEPRO A10-9700E
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    β€”
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 4600
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    β€”
    Target Use
    Embedded
    β€”