
Core i5-4690
Popular choices:

Core i7-4860EQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-4690
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $162 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌78.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 47W.
Core i7-4860EQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 84W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4690 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,508 vs 5,584).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
Core i5-4690
2014Core i7-4860EQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $162 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 84W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌78.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 47W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4690 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,508 vs 5,584).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4690 better than Core i7-4860EQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4690 and Core i7-4860EQ

Core i5-4690
Core i5-4690
The Core i5-4690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $346.

Core i7-4860EQ
Core i7-4860EQ
The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4690 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4860EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-4690 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-4690 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4690 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4690 scores 5,584 against the Core i7-4860EQ's 5,508 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-4690. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4690 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860EQ.
| Feature | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+22% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+94% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Crystalwell (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 5,584+1% | 5,508 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4690 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-4690 launched at $272 MSRP, while the Core i7-4860EQ debuted at $434. On MSRP ($272 vs $434), the Core i5-4690 is $162 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4690 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-4860EQ — making the Core i5-4690 the 47.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4690 | Core i7-4860EQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272-37% | $434 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+61% | 12.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













