Core i5-4690K
VS
Atom C3808

Core i5-4690K vs Atom C3808

Intel

Core i5-4690K

4 Cores4 Thrd88 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Atom C3808

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4690K is positioned at rank 718 and the Atom C3808 is on rank 737, so the Core i5-4690K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4690K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13315%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12582%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9135%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2752%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2180%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1907%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1092%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1078%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
982%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
970%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
944%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
931%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
927%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
919%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
100%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
100%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
100%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
99%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
99%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
99%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
98%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
98%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
98%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
97%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14472%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2428%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1875%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
100%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
96%
#736
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#737
Atom C3808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#747
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#749
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3808 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-4690KAtom C3808
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($101)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4690K (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-4690KAtom C3808
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($101)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4690K and Atom C3808

Intel

Core i5-4690K

The Core i5-4690K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 88 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,689 points. Launch price was $300.

Intel

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4690K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3808 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-4690K versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4690K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4690K uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom C3808 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4690K scores 5,689 against the Atom C3808's 5,671 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4690K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4690K vs 12 MB on the Atom C3808.

FeatureCore i5-4690KAtom C3808
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+95%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
12 MB+4700%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
5,689
5,671
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4690K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3808 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4690K versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3808 — the Atom C3808 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3808 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-4690K) vs 12 (Atom C3808) — the Core i5-4690K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-4690KAtom C3808
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
256 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4690K) / not specified (Atom C3808). The Core i5-4690K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Atom C3808 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4690K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-4690KAtom C3808
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop