Core i5-5200U vs Xeon L7455

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon L7455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon L7455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5200U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L7455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Xeon L7455

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,494 vs 2,503).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5200U better than Xeon L7455?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L7455 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5200U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5200U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5200U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-5200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon L7455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5200U

The Core i5-5200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,503 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon L7455

The Xeon L7455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,494 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5200U is built on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-5200U scores 2,503 against the Xeon L7455's 2,494 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-5200U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5200U vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L7455.

Feature	Core i5-5200U	Xeon L7455
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+3%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	—
PassMark	2,503	2,494

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L7455 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.