Core i5-5257U
VS
FX-8800P

Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P

Intel

Core i5-5257U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015
VS
AMD

FX-8800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-5257U is positioned at rank 725 and the FX-8800P is on rank 903, so the Core i5-5257U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5257U

#713
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1034%
#714
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1019%
#715
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
935%
#716
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
931%
#717
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
923%
#719
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
891%
#720
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
854%
#721
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
853%
#722
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
830%
#725
Core i5-5257U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P

#891
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1553%
#892
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1530%
#893
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1405%
#894
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1399%
#895
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1386%
#897
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1338%
#898
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1283%
#899
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1281%
#900
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1247%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#905
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-8800P leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-5257U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-5257UFX-8800P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-5257UFX-8800P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-5257U and FX-8800P

Intel

Core i5-5257U

The Core i5-5257U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,837 points. Launch price was $315.

AMD

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-5257U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-5257U versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 9.2% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-5257U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5257U scores 2,837 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-5257U.

FeatureCore i5-5257UFX-8800P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,837
2,833
Geekbench 6 Single
950
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5257U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-5257UFX-8800P
Socket
FCBGA1168
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 1866 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-5257U) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Core i5-5257U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 6100), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5257U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-5257UFX-8800P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile