Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P

Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-5257U

2 / 4

2,837

+0.1%

2,833

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5257U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Graphics 6100, while FX-8800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,833 vs 2,837).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-5257U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5257U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8800P better than Core i5-5257U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8800P is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5257U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5257U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8800P is the better buy right now. FX-8800P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-5257U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8800P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-5257U vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5257U

The Core i5-5257U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,837 points. Launch price was $315.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5257U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-5257U versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 9.2% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-5257U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5257U scores 2,837 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-5257U.

Feature	Core i5-5257U	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+29%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,837	2,833
Geekbench 6 Single	950	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5257U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-5257U	FX-8800P
Socket	FCBGA1168	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3 1866 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-5257U) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Core i5-5257U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 6100), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5257U targets Mobile.