
Core i5-5675C

Opteron 6274
Core i5-5675C vs Opteron 6274 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-5675C vs Opteron 6274 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-5675C vs Opteron 6274: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-5675C
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $363 less on MSRP ($276 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($276 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6274 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6274, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6274
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,643 vs 5,693).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $276 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5675C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-5675C better than Opteron 6274?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-5675C vs Opteron 6274 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5675C
The Core i5-5675C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,693 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6274
The Opteron 6274 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,643 points. Launch price was $909.
Processing Power
The Core i5-5675C packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6274 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6274 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-5675C versus 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6274 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-5675C (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-5675C uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6274 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5675C scores 5,693 against the Opteron 6274's 5,643 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-5675C. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5675C vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6274.
| Feature | Core i5-5675C | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8.00391 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,693 | 5,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-5675C uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6274 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-5675C | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-5675C) / not specified (Opteron 6274). The Core i5-5675C includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Opteron 6274 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5675C targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-5675C | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-5675C was priced at $276, while the Opteron 6274 came in at $639. On launch pricing ($276 vs $639), Core i5-5675C was $363 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5675C delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 8.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6274 — making the Core i5-5675C the 80.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-5675C | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $276-57% | $639 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6+134% | 8.8 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















