Core i5-5675C vs Xeon E3-1240L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5675C vs Xeon E3-1240L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5675C vs Xeon E3-1240L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5675C

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while Xeon E3-1240L v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1240L v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $276 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1240L v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,681 vs 5,693).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5675C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5675C better than Xeon E3-1240L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5675C is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5675C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5675C is the better buy right now. Core i5-5675C comes in at an unclear MSRP at $276 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240L v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5675C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5675C vs Xeon E3-1240L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5675C

The Core i5-5675C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,693 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240L v3

The Xeon E3-1240L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,681 points. Launch price was $278.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5675C packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1240L v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-5675C versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v3 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-5675C (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-5675C uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5675C scores 5,693 against the Xeon E3-1240L v3's 5,681 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-5675C. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5675C vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v3.

Feature	Core i5-5675C	Xeon E3-1240L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+55%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,693	5,681

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1150 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-5675C	Xeon E3-1240L v3
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-5675C) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240L v3). The Core i5-5675C includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Xeon E3-1240L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5675C targets Desktop.