Core i5-5675R vs Opteron 6376

Core i5-5675R vs Opteron 6376 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-5675R

4 / 4

5,564

0.0%

5,572

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5675R vs Opteron 6376 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5675R vs Opteron 6376: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5675R

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $364 less on MSRP ($339 MSRP vs $703 MSRP).
✅Delivers 107.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $703 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while Opteron 6376 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6376 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,564 vs 5,572).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6376, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6376

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($703 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5675R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6376 better than Core i5-5675R?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6376 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5675R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6376 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.4% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6376 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6376 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Opteron 6376 comes in 107.4% more expensive on MSRP at $703 MSRP versus $339 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-5675R only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 18.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5675R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-5675R vs Opteron 6376 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5675R

The Core i5-5675R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,564 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6376

The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5675R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6376 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-5675R versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-5675R (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-5675R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6376 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5675R scores 5,564 against the Opteron 6376's 5,572 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 6376. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5675R vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6376.

Feature	Core i5-5675R	Opteron 6376
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+35%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+1500%	16 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	5,564	5,572
Geekbench 6 Single	1,157	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5675R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6376 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-5675R	Opteron 6376
Socket	BGA1364	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-5675R) / not specified (Opteron 6376). The Core i5-5675R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Opteron 6376 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5675R targets All-in-One Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-5675R rivals A10-7890K.

Feature	Core i5-5675R	Opteron 6376
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	All-in-One Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-5675R was priced at $339, while the Opteron 6376 came in at $703. On launch pricing ($339 vs $703), Core i5-5675R was $364 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5675R delivers 16.4 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Opteron 6376 — making the Core i5-5675R the 69.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-5675R	Opteron 6376
MSRP	$339-52%	$703
Performance per Dollar	16.4+108%	7.9
Release Date	2015	2012

Search Core i5-5675R on Amazon

Search Opteron 6376 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.