Core i5-6200U vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Core i5-6200U
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6200U is positioned at rank 230 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is on rank 880, so the Core i5-6200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6200U
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-6200U | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-6200U | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6200U and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Core i5-6200U
The Core i5-6200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,990 points. Launch price was $281.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.66 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron Dual-Core T1600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6200U versus 1.66 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — a 51.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-6200U. The Core i5-6200U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6200U scores 2,990 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1600's 3,000 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600.
| Feature | Core i5-6200U | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+69% | 1.66 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,990 | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 946 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6200U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6200U versus 667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 supports 197.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6200U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-6200U) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) — the Core i5-6200U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Integrated (Core i5-6200U) and GL40,GM45,GM47,PM45 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600).
| Feature | Core i5-6200U | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | 667+16575% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+838860700% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6200U) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T1600). The Core i5-6200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 520), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6200U targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron Dual-Core T1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-6200U rivals A12-9700P; Celeron Dual-Core T1600 rivals Pentium T2390.
| Feature | Core i5-6200U | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 520 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | false |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-6200U and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
