CPU
GPU
Core i5-6267U
Athlon X4 840
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6267U is positioned at rank 534 and the Athlon X4 840 is on rank 563, so the Core i5-6267U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6267U
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 840
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-6267U | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-6267U | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6267U and Athlon X4 840
Core i5-6267U
The Core i5-6267U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,360 points. Launch price was $304.
Athlon X4 840
The Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,331 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6267U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 840 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-6267U versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 840 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 840 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-6267U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 840 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6267U scores 3,360 against the Athlon X4 840's 3,331 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-6267U.
| Feature | Core i5-6267U | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,360 | 3,331 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6267U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 840 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6267U versus DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 840 — the Core i5-6267U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 840 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-6267U) vs 16 (Athlon X4 840) — the Athlon X4 840 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-6267U | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6267U) / not specified (Athlon X4 840). The Core i5-6267U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 550), while the Athlon X4 840 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6267U targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-6267U | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Graphics 550 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-6267U and Athlon X4 840
