Core i5-6267U vs PRO A8-9600

Core i5-6267U vs PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6267U

2 / 4

3,360

+1.3%

3,318

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6267U vs PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6267U vs PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6267U

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 550, while PRO A8-9600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A8-9600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

PRO A8-9600

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,318 vs 3,360).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6267U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A8-9600 better than Core i5-6267U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A8-9600 is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6267U pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6267U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A8-9600 still makes the most sense overall. PRO A8-9600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A8-9600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6267U vs PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6267U

The Core i5-6267U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,360 points. Launch price was $304.

PRO A8-9600

The PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6267U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A8-9600 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A8-9600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-6267U versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A8-9600 — a 3% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-6267U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A8-9600 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6267U scores 3,360 against the PRO A8-9600's 3,318 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-6267U.

Feature	Core i5-6267U	PRO A8-9600
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,360+1%	3,318

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6267U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A8-9600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6267U	PRO A8-9600
Socket	BGA1356	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6267U) / not specified (PRO A8-9600). The Core i5-6267U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 550), while the PRO A8-9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6267U targets Mobile.