Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-6267U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-6267U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-6267U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4370T

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i5-6267U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-6267U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4370T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,360 vs 3,361).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4370T better than Core i5-6267U?

Yes. Core i3-4370T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4370T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4370T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4370T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4370T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4370T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-6267U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i5-6267U

The Core i5-6267U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,360 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4370T and Core i5-6267U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-6267U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-6267U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Core i5-6267U's 3,360 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-4370T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6267U.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-6267U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,361	3,360

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6267U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370T versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6267U — the Core i5-6267U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4370T) vs 12 (Core i5-6267U) — the Core i3-4370T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-6267U
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370T) and Iris Graphics 550 (Core i5-6267U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power, Core i5-6267U targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-6267U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	Iris Graphics 550
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	Mobile