Core i3-4370T vs Core i3-7167U

Intel

Core i3-4370T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-7167U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4370T vs Core i3-7167U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i3-7167U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i3-7167U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4370T

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,361 vs 3,368).
  • Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i3-7167U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-7167U

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4370T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4370T better than Core i3-7167U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4370T is ahead with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7167U pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i3-4370T also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7167U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4370T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4370T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-7167U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i3-7167U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

Intel

Core i3-7167U

The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4370T and Core i3-7167U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370T (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-7167U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Core i3-7167U's 3,368 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-7167U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7167U.

FeatureCore i3-4370TCore i3-7167U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,361
3,368
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7167U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370T versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7167U — the Core i3-7167U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4370T) vs 12 (Core i3-7167U) — the Core i3-4370T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-4370TCore i3-7167U
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370T) and Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Core i3-7167U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power, Core i3-7167U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i3-4370TCore i3-7167U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop Low Power
Mobile