Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4370T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4370T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4370T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3740

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4370T

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,361 vs 3,380).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Atom Z3740 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4370T better than Atom Z3740?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4370T is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3740 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3740 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4370T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4370T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Atom Z3740 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4370T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4370T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3740

The Atom Z3740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $32.

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3740 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4370T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3740 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Atom Z3740 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T — a 55.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370T (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Atom Z3740 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4370T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3740 scores 3,380 against the Core i3-4370T's 3,361 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom Z3740. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z3740 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4370T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	3.3 GHz+77%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	3.3 GHz+148%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,380	3,361

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3740 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4370T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3740 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370T — the Core i3-4370T supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4370T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3740) vs 16 (Core i3-4370T) — the Core i3-4370T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4370T
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3740) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3740) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4370T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop Low Power