Atom Z3740 vs Phenom II X6 1065T

Intel

Atom Z3740

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X6 1065T

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Atom Z3740 vs Phenom II X6 1065T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3740 vs Phenom II X6 1065T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3740 vs Phenom II X6 1065T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3740

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Phenom II X6 1065T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,380 vs 3,412).

Phenom II X6 1065T

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom Z3740 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Atom Z3740 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3740 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3740 better than Phenom II X6 1065T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom Z3740 is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1065T pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1065T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom Z3740 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom Z3740 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X6 1065T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z3740 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z3740 vs Phenom II X6 1065T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom Z3740

The Atom Z3740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $32.

AMD

Phenom II X6 1065T

The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom Z3740 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1065T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Atom Z3740 versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T — a 58.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1065T (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom Z3740 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3740 scores 3,380 against the Phenom II X6 1065T's 3,412 — a 0.9% lead for the Phenom II X6 1065T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z3740 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1065T.

FeatureAtom Z3740Phenom II X6 1065T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.4 GHz+83%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.9 GHz+118%
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Thuban (2010)
PassMark
3,380
3,412
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3740 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom Z3740Phenom II X6 1065T
Socket
UTFCBGA1380
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z3740 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Phenom II X6 1065T requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z3740Phenom II X6 1065T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)