Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E5-2609 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E5-2609 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E5-2609 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3740

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Xeon E5-2609 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2609 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,369 vs 3,380).
❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3740 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3740 better than Xeon E5-2609 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2609 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom Z3740 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3740 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3740 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z3740 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3740 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E5-2609 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3740

The Atom Z3740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $32.

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom Z3740 and Xeon E5-2609 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Atom Z3740 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2609 v2 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom Z3740 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3740 scores 3,380 against the Xeon E5-2609 v2's 3,369 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom Z3740. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z3740 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v2.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Xeon E5-2609 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.5 GHz+34%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	2.5 GHz+88%
L3 Cache	0 kB	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	3,380	3,369

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3740 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Xeon E5-2609 v2
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—