Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3740

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 54W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,380 vs 3,406).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4150.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom Z3740.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Atom Z3740 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2600% higher power demand at 54W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150 better than Atom Z3740?

Yes. Core i3-4150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3740

The Atom Z3740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $32.

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3740 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3740 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Atom Z3740 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 — a 61.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4150 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom Z3740 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4150 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3740 scores 3,380 against the Core i3-4150's 3,406 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4150. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z3740 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	3.5 GHz+88%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	3.5 GHz+163%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,380	3,406
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,071

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3740 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4150 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3740 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150 — the Core i3-4150 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4150 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3740) vs 16 (Core i3-4150) — the Core i3-4150 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3740) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4150).

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4150
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3740) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3740) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4150) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-4150
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Budget Desktop