Core i3-4370T vs Xeon E5-4603

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4370T vs Xeon E5-4603 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4370T vs Xeon E5-4603: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4370T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $202 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $202 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-4603 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4603 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,361 vs 3,391).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4603, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5-4603

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($202 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4370T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4603 better than Core i3-4370T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4603 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4370T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4603 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4603 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4603 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-4603 comes in 46.4% more expensive on MSRP at $202 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4370T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 45.1% better value on paper (24.4 vs 16.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4370T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4370T vs Xeon E5-4603 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

Xeon E5-4603

The Xeon E5-4603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $712.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4603 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-4603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4603 — a 49.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370T (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Xeon E5-4603's 3,391 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-4603. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4603.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Xeon E5-4603
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10240 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	3,361	3,391

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Xeon E5-4603
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) / not specified (Xeon E5-4603). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-4603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Xeon E5-4603
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4370T was priced at $138, while the Xeon E5-4603 came in at $202. On launch pricing ($138 vs $202), Core i3-4370T was $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4603 — making the Core i3-4370T the 36.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Xeon E5-4603
MSRP	$138-32%	$202
Performance per Dollar	24.4+45%	16.8
Release Date	2015	2012

Search Core i3-4370T on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4603 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.