PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-2500S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-2500S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4370T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 17.6 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,361 vs 3,373).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2500S.

Core i5-2500S

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4370T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2500S better than Core i3-4370T?

Yes. Core i5-2500S is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2500S is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2500S is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-2500S comes in 39.1% more expensive on MSRP at $192 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4370T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 38.6% better value on paper (24.4 vs 17.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4370T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4370T vs Core i5-2500S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370T

The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i5-2500S

The Core i5-2500S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,373 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2500S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2500S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500S — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500S (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2500S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Core i5-2500S's 3,373 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-2500S. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500S.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-2500S
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+22%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6144 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,361	3,373
Geekbench 6 Single	—	600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2500S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370T versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500S — the Core i3-4370T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-2500S
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500S). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370T) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power, Core i5-2500S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500S rivals Phenom II X4 980.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-2500S
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4370T was priced at $138, while the Core i5-2500S came in at $192. On launch pricing ($138 vs $192), Core i3-4370T was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 17.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500S — making the Core i3-4370T the 32.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4370T	Core i5-2500S
MSRP	$138-28%	$192
Performance per Dollar	24.4+39%	17.6
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Core i3-4370T on Amazon

Search Core i5-2500S on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.