Core i3-4370T vs Xeon W3565
Core i3-4370T
Xeon W3565
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4370T is positioned at rank 700 and the Xeon W3565 is on rank 827, so the Core i3-4370T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4370T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3565
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($69) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+102%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($69) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4370T and Xeon W3565
Core i3-4370T
The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.
Xeon W3565
The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3565 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3565 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3565 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3565 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Xeon W3565's 3,391 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W3565. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.46 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,361 | 3,391 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 513 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,726 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3565 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4370T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4370T) vs 3 (Xeon W3565). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4370T) vs 36 (Xeon W3565) — the Xeon W3565 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 36+125% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) vs Yes (Xeon W3565). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4370T launched at $138 MSRP, while the Xeon W3565 debuted at $294. At current prices ($138 vs $69), the Xeon W3565 is $69 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W3565 — making the Xeon W3565 the 67.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-53% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $138 | $69-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 49.1+101% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4370T and Xeon W3565
