Core i5-6350HQ
VS
Core i3-7100

Core i5-6350HQ vs Core i3-7100

Intel

Core i5-6350HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-7100

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6350HQ is positioned at rank 1002 and the Core i3-7100 is on rank 532, so the Core i3-7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6350HQ

#990
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2109%
#991
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2078%
#992
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1908%
#993
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1899%
#994
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1882%
#996
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1817%
#997
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1743%
#998
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1740%
#999
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1693%
#1002
Core i5-6350HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
98%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
96%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
95%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
95%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
94%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8471%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8004%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5811%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1751%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1387%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1213%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
695%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
686%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
624%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
624%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
617%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
601%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
592%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
590%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
585%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
97%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
94%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
94%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
100%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
99%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
99%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
97%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
96%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
95%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
95%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-6350HQCore i3-7100
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-H (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-6350HQ (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-6350HQCore i3-7100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6350HQ and Core i3-7100

Intel

Core i5-6350HQ

The Core i5-6350HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,255 points. Launch price was $306.

Intel

Core i3-7100

The Core i3-7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

The Core i5-6350HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7100 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-6350HQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-6350HQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7100 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-6350HQ uses the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7100 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6350HQ scores 4,255 against the Core i3-7100's 4,306 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-7100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6350HQ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100.

FeatureCore i5-6350HQCore i3-7100
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake-H (2015−2016)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,255
4,306+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
803
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6350HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i5-6350HQCore i3-7100
Socket
BGA1440
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6350HQ) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100). Both include integrated graphics Iris Pro Graphics 580 (Core i5-6350HQ) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6350HQ targets High Performance Laptop, Core i3-7100 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6350HQ rivals FX-9830P.

FeatureCore i5-6350HQCore i3-7100
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Pro Graphics 580
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Laptop
Desktop