Core i5-6400T vs Core i7-2760QM
Core i5-6400T
Core i7-2760QM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6400T is positioned at rank 747 and the Core i7-2760QM is on rank 249, so the Core i7-2760QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6400T
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2760QM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-6400T | Core i7-2760QM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-6400T | Core i7-2760QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6400T and Core i7-2760QM
Core i5-6400T
The Core i5-6400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,243 points. Launch price was $192.
Core i7-2760QM
The Core i7-2760QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,313 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2760QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6400T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2760QM — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-2760QM (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-6400T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2760QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6400T scores 4,243 against the Core i7-2760QM's 4,313 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-2760QM. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6400T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2760QM.
| Feature | Core i5-6400T | Core i7-2760QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,243 | 4,313+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2760QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6400T versus 1600 on the Core i7-2760QM — the Core i7-2760QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6400T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170,Z270 (Core i5-6400T) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2760QM).
| Feature | Core i5-6400T | Core i7-2760QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | 1600+39900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+209715100% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6400T) vs true (Core i7-2760QM). Both include integrated graphics — HD 530 (Core i5-6400T) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2760QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6400T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-6400T rivals Core i3-7100; Core i7-2760QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i5-6400T | Core i7-2760QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD 530 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-6400T and Core i7-2760QM
