Core i5-6402P vs FX-8150

Core i5-6402P vs FX-8150 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6402P

4 / 4

5,343

+0.5%

5,318

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6402P vs FX-8150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6402P vs FX-8150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6402P

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.4 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-8150

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,318 vs 5,343).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 29.4 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6402P better than FX-8150?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8150 is ahead with a 22.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6402P pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. FX-8150 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6402P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6402P is the better buy right now. Core i5-6402P comes in $63 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $245 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-8150 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 35.2% better value on MSRP (29.4 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6402P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6402P vs FX-8150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6402P

The Core i5-6402P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $187.

FX-8150

The FX-8150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,318 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6402P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8150 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8150 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-6402P versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-8150 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-8150 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-6402P uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6402P scores 5,343 against the FX-8150's 5,318 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-6402P. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6402P vs 8192 kB on the FX-8150.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	FX-8150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.2 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	6 MB	8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8192 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	5,343	5,318

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6402P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	FX-8150
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6402P was priced at $182, while the FX-8150 came in at $245. On launch pricing ($182 vs $245), Core i5-6402P was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6402P delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the FX-8150 — making the Core i5-6402P the 30% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	FX-8150
MSRP	$182-26%	$245
Performance per Dollar	29.4+35%	21.7
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Core i5-6402P on Amazon

Search FX-8150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.