Core i5-6402P vs N100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6402P vs N100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6402P vs N100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6402P

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 5,355).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.4 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N100

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 29.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is N100 better than Core i5-6402P?

Yes. N100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, N100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

N100 is the better buy right now. N100 comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 42.5% better value on MSRP (41.8 vs 29.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-6402P vs N100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6402P

The Core i5-6402P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $187.

N100

The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-6402P and N100 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-6402P versus 3.4 GHz on the N100 — identical boost frequencies. The Core i5-6402P is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-6402P scores 5,343 against the N100's 5,355 — a 0.2% lead for the N100. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6402P vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	N100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	5,343	5,355

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6402P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	N100
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6402P was priced at $182, while the N100 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($182 vs $128), N100 was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6402P delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the N100 — making the N100 the 35.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	N100
MSRP	$182	$128-30%
Performance per Dollar	29.4	41.8+42%
Release Date	2015	2023

Search Core i5-6402P on Amazon

Search N100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.