Core i5-6402P vs Xeon E5-2630L

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6402P vs Xeon E5-2630L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6402P vs Xeon E5-2630L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6402P

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630L, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630L mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2630L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,305 vs 5,343).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6402P better than Xeon E5-2630L?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2630L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-6402P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6402P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6402P is the better buy right now. Core i5-6402P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2630L is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6402P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6402P vs Xeon E5-2630L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6402P

The Core i5-6402P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $187.

Xeon E5-2630L

The Xeon E5-2630L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,305 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6402P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-6402P versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630L — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-6402P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-6402P uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630L uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6402P scores 5,343 against the Xeon E5-2630L's 5,305 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-6402P. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6402P vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630L.

Feature	Core i5-6402P	Xeon E5-2630L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	15360 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	5,343	5,305

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6402P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630L uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.