Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon E5-1607 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon E5-1607 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6440HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon E5-1607 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1607 v3 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1607 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,932 vs 5,021).
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6440HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6440HQ better than Xeon E5-1607 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-6440HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6440HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6440HQ is the better buy right now. Core i5-6440HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1607 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6440HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6440HQ

The Core i5-6440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,021 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon E5-1607 v3

The Xeon E5-1607 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,932 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-6440HQ and Xeon E5-1607 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6440HQ versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v3 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-6440HQ (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-6440HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440HQ scores 5,021 against the Xeon E5-1607 v3's 4,932 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-6440HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6440HQ vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v3.

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon E5-1607 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+13%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.1 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	6 MB	10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	5,021+2%	4,932

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6440HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon E5-1607 v3
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440HQ) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v3). The Core i5-6440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440HQ targets Mobile.