PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon X5672 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon X5672: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6440HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon X5672 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5672 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,021 vs 5,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5672, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5672

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6440HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5672 better than Core i5-6440HQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5672 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-6440HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5672 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5672 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5672 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X5672 comes in 20.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-6440HQ only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 15.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6440HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6440HQ vs Xeon X5672 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6440HQ

The Core i5-6440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,021 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon X5672

The Xeon X5672 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,036 points. Launch price was $115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6440HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5672's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6440HQ versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5672 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X5672 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-6440HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5672 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440HQ scores 5,021 against the Xeon X5672's 5,036 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X5672. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6440HQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5672.

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon X5672
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	6 MB	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,021	5,036

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6440HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5672 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6440HQ versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5672 — the Core i5-6440HQ supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-6440HQ) vs 3 (Xeon X5672).

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon X5672
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440HQ) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5672). The Core i5-6440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon X5672 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440HQ targets Mobile, Xeon X5672 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5672 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon X5672
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mobile	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6440HQ was priced at $250, while the Xeon X5672 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($250 vs $300), Core i5-6440HQ was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6440HQ delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5672 — making the Core i5-6440HQ the 17.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6440HQ	Xeon X5672
MSRP	$250-17%	$300
Performance per Dollar	20.1+20%	16.8
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Core i5-6440HQ on Amazon

Search Xeon X5672 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.