
Core i5-6442EQ

Core i7-9700K
Core i5-6442EQ vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-6442EQ vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-6442EQ vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-6442EQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $135 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,483 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +174.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 108.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-6442EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌54% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i5-6442EQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-6442EQ vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6442EQ
The Core i5-6442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 4,483 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6442EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-6442EQ versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 88.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Core i5-6442EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6442EQ scores 4,483 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 105% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6442EQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | Core i5-6442EQ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz+158% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,483 | 14,397+221% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-6442EQ) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-6442EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-6442EQ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-6442EQ was priced at $250, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($250 vs $385), Core i5-6442EQ was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6442EQ delivers 17.9 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 70.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-6442EQ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-35% | $385 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 37.4+109% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














