Core i3-1115GRE vs Core i5-6442EQ

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i5-6442EQ

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-1115GRE

2020

Why buy it

  • +2.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-6442EQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-6442EQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Core i5-6442EQ

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $88 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
  • Delivers 32.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,483 vs 4,588).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115GRE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1115GRE better than Core i5-6442EQ?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-6442EQ is ahead with a 10.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115GRE pulls ahead with 2.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115GRE is the better fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-1115GRE is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i3-1115GRE is 35.2% more expensive on MSRP at $338 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it gives you 2.3% better PassMark. Core i5-6442EQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 32.1% better value on paper (17.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1115GRE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
1080p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high107 FPS103 FPS
ultra82 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium114 FPS111 FPS
high88 FPS86 FPS
ultra68 FPS67 FPS
4K
low65 FPS66 FPS
medium55 FPS56 FPS
high42 FPS43 FPS
ultra33 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
1080p
low90 FPS112 FPS
medium80 FPS112 FPS
high73 FPS112 FPS
ultra54 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low73 FPS112 FPS
medium64 FPS112 FPS
high60 FPS112 FPS
ultra47 FPS91 FPS
4K
low54 FPS112 FPS
medium49 FPS102 FPS
high37 FPS79 FPS
ultra27 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
1080p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS
1440p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS
4K
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
1080p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS
1440p
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS
4K
low115 FPS112 FPS
medium115 FPS112 FPS
high115 FPS112 FPS
ultra115 FPS112 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1115GRE and Core i5-6442EQ

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.

Intel

Core i5-6442EQ

The Core i5-6442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 4,483 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115GRE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6442EQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-6442EQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-6442EQ — a 69% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115GRE. The Core i3-1115GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-6442EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115GRE scores 4,588 against the Core i5-6442EQ's 4,483 — a 2.3% lead for the Core i3-1115GRE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115GRE vs 6 MB on the Core i5-6442EQ.

FeatureCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+105%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
4,588+2%
4,483
Geekbench 6 Single
1,175
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,233
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-1115GRE) / not specified (Core i5-6442EQ). The Core i3-1115GRE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-6442EQ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-1115GRE launched at $338 MSRP, while the Core i5-6442EQ debuted at $250. On MSRP ($338 vs $250), the Core i5-6442EQ is $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115GRE delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 17.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-6442EQ — making the Core i5-6442EQ the 27.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-1115GRECore i5-6442EQ
MSRP
$338
$250-26%
Performance per Dollar
13.6
17.9+32%
Release Date
2020
2015