
Core i3-1115GRE
Popular choices:

Core i5-6442EQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-1115GRE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-6442EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-6442EQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Core i5-6442EQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $88 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,483 vs 4,588).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115GRE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-1115GRE
2020Core i5-6442EQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-6442EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $88 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-6442EQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,483 vs 4,588).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115GRE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1115GRE better than Core i5-6442EQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1115GRE and Core i5-6442EQ

Core i3-1115GRE
Core i3-1115GRE
The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.

Core i5-6442EQ
Core i5-6442EQ
The Core i5-6442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 4,483 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1115GRE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6442EQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-6442EQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-6442EQ — a 69% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115GRE. The Core i3-1115GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-6442EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115GRE scores 4,588 against the Core i5-6442EQ's 4,483 — a 2.3% lead for the Core i3-1115GRE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115GRE vs 6 MB on the Core i5-6442EQ.
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+105% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 4,588+2% | 4,483 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,233 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-1115GRE) / not specified (Core i5-6442EQ). The Core i3-1115GRE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-6442EQ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-1115GRE launched at $338 MSRP, while the Core i5-6442EQ debuted at $250. On MSRP ($338 vs $250), the Core i5-6442EQ is $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115GRE delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 17.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-6442EQ — making the Core i5-6442EQ the 27.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $338 | $250-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 17.9+32% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












