Core i3-1115GRE
VS
FX-6350

Core i3-1115GRE vs FX-6350

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
VS
AMD

FX-6350

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-1115GRE is positioned at rank 1009 and the FX-6350 is on rank 541, so the FX-6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1115GRE

#996
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2162%
#997
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2130%
#998
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1956%
#999
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1947%
#1000
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1929%
#1002
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1863%
#1003
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1786%
#1004
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1783%
#1005
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1735%
#1008
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1010
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1011
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1012
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1013
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1014
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
97%
#1016
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1017
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1019
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1020
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
94%
#1021
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#1022
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6350

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8868%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8380%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6084%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1833%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1270%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
727%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
718%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
654%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
654%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
646%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
629%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
620%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
618%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
612%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
98%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
98%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
100%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
100%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
97%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
96%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
96%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
96%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-1115GRE (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, LPDDR4X, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($480)
More affordable ($55)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6350 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+783%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($480)
More affordable ($55)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1115GRE and FX-6350

Intel

Core i3-1115GRE

The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.

AMD

FX-6350

The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115GRE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i3-1115GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115GRE scores 4,588 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 1.1% lead for the FX-6350.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz+77%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6144 kB+380%
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
4,588
4,640+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,175
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,233
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115GRE uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
Socket
FCBGA1449
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-1115GRE) / not specified (FX-6350). The Core i3-1115GRE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the FX-6350 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-1115GRE launched at $338 MSRP, while the FX-6350 debuted at $132. At current prices ($480 vs $55), the FX-6350 is $425 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115GRE delivers 9.6 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 159.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-1115GREFX-6350
MSRP
$338
$132-61%
Avg Price (30d)
$480
$55-89%
Performance per Dollar
9.6
84.4+779%
Release Date
2020
2013