
Core i3-1115GRE

Core i7-2860QM
Core i3-1115GRE vs Core i7-2860QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1115GRE vs Core i7-2860QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1115GRE vs Core i7-2860QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1115GRE
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2860QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (4,588 vs 4,597).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $338 MSRP, while Core i7-2860QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-2860QM
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2860QM better than Core i3-1115GRE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1115GRE vs Core i7-2860QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115GRE
The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020β2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.

Core i7-2860QM
The Core i7-2860QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,597 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1115GRE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2860QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-2860QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-2860QM β a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115GRE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-1115GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020β2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-2860QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115GRE scores 4,588 against the Core i7-2860QM's 4,597 β a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-2860QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115GRE vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2860QM.
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i7-2860QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020β2021) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 4,588 | 4,597 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,175 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,233 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1115GRE uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-2860QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115GRE versus 1600 on the Core i7-2860QM β the Core i3-1115GRE supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-1115GRE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115GRE) vs 16 (Core i7-2860QM) β the Core i7-2860QM offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i3-1115GRE) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2860QM).
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i7-2860QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+100% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i3-1115GRE supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-1115GRE) vs true (Core i7-2860QM). Both include integrated graphics β Intel UHD Graphics (Core i3-1115GRE) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2860QM) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2860QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i3-1115GRE | Core i7-2860QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













