Core i5-6600 vs Core i7-4810MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6600 vs Core i7-4810MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6600 vs Core i7-4810MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6600

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.0 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4810MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,058 vs 6,074).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.

Core i7-4810MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 27.0 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4810MQ better than Core i5-6600?

Yes. Core i7-4810MQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4810MQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4810MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4810MQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4810MQ comes in 68.8% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $224 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-6600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 68.3% better value on paper (27.0 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6600 vs Core i7-4810MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6600

The Core i5-6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,058 points. Launch price was $224.

Core i7-4810MQ

The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4810MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-6600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-6600 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6600 scores 6,058 against the Core i7-4810MQ's 6,074 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4810MQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4810MQ.

Feature	Core i5-6600	Core i7-4810MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+3%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	6,058	6,074

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6600 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6600	Core i7-4810MQ
Socket	LGA1151	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6600 was priced at $224, while the Core i7-4810MQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($224 vs $378), Core i5-6600 was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6600 delivers 27.0 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-4810MQ — making the Core i5-6600 the 50.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6600	Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP	$224-41%	$378
Performance per Dollar	27.0+68%	16.1
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Core i5-6600 on Amazon

Search Core i7-4810MQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.