Core i5-6600
VS
Core i7-4810MQ

Core i5-6600 vs Core i7-4810MQ

Intel

Core i5-6600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-4810MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6600 is positioned at rank 641 and the Core i7-4810MQ is on rank 956, so the Core i5-6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11528%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10893%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7909%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2383%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1887%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1651%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
946%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
933%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
850%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
850%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
840%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
818%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
806%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
803%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
796%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4810MQ

#944
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1826%
#945
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1799%
#946
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1652%
#947
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1644%
#948
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1629%
#950
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1573%
#951
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1508%
#952
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1506%
#953
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1465%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
100%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
99%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
98%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
95%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
95%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-6600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4810MQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-6600Core i7-4810MQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($90)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-6600 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 76% cheaper ($90 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-6600Core i7-4810MQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+319%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($90)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6600 and Core i7-4810MQ

Intel

Core i5-6600

The Core i5-6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,058 points. Launch price was $224.

Intel

Core i7-4810MQ

The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i5-6600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4810MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-6600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-6600 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6600 scores 6,058 against the Core i7-4810MQ's 6,074 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4810MQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4810MQ.

FeatureCore i5-6600Core i7-4810MQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
6,058
6,074
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6600 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-6600Core i7-4810MQ
Socket
LGA1151
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-6600 launched at $224 MSRP, while the Core i7-4810MQ debuted at $378. At current prices ($90 vs $378), the Core i5-6600 is $288 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6600 delivers 67.3 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-4810MQ — making the Core i5-6600 the 122.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-6600Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP
$224-41%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$90-76%
$378
Performance per Dollar
67.3+318%
16.1
Release Date
2015
2014