
Core i5-6600T
Popular choices:

Core i5-7440HQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-6600T
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7440HQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core i5-7440HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-7440HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,490 vs 5,565).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Core i5-6600T
2015Core i5-7440HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7440HQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core i5-7440HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,490 vs 5,565).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-6600T better than Core i5-7440HQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6600T and Core i5-7440HQ

Core i5-6600T
Core i5-6600T
The Core i5-6600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,565 points. Launch price was $192.

Core i5-7440HQ
Core i5-7440HQ
The Core i5-7440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,490 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-6600T and Core i5-7440HQ share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6600T versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7440HQ — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-7440HQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-6600T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7440HQ uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6600T scores 5,565 against the Core i5-7440HQ's 5,490 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-6600T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,175 vs 1,277, a 8.3% lead for the Core i5-7440HQ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Kaby Lake-H (2017) |
| PassMark | 5,565+1% | 5,490 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 7,083 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,175 | 1,277+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,212 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7440HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170,Q150,Q170,B250,Q250,H270,Z270 (Core i5-6600T) and HM175,QM175 (Core i5-7440HQ).
| Feature | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6600T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7440HQ). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i5-6600T) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7440HQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6600T targets Office, Core i5-7440HQ targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6600T rivals AMD Athlon II X4 640; Core i5-7440HQ rivals Ryzen 5 2500U.
| Feature | Core i5-6600T | Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Office | High Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












