Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4700HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4700HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4700HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6600T

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Core i7-4700HQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,565 vs 5,579).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core i7-4700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4700HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4700HQ better than Core i5-6600T?

Yes. Core i7-4700HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4700HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4700HQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4700HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-6600T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (26.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6600T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4700HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6600T

The Core i5-6600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,565 points. Launch price was $192.

Core i7-4700HQ

The Core i7-4700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,579 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6600T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700HQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6600T versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700HQ — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-6600T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4700HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6600T scores 5,565 against the Core i7-4700HQ's 5,579 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4700HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700HQ.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4700HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+13%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,565	5,579
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,083	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,175	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,212	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4700HQ
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6600T) / not specified (Core i7-4700HQ). The Core i5-6600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4700HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6600T targets Office. Direct competitor: Core i5-6600T rivals AMD Athlon II X4 640.