Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4860EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4860EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4860EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6600T

2015

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4860EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4860EQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,508 vs 5,565).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6600T better than Core i7-4860EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4860EQ is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6600T pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core i7-4860EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6600T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6600T is the better buy right now. Core i5-6600T comes in $221 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $434 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4860EQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 105.9% better value on MSRP (26.1 vs 12.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6600T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6600T vs Core i7-4860EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6600T

The Core i5-6600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,565 points. Launch price was $192.

Core i7-4860EQ

The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6600T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4860EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6600T versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-6600T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6600T scores 5,565 against the Core i7-4860EQ's 5,508 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-6600T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860EQ.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4860EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+50%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,565+1%	5,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,083	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,175	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,212	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4860EQ
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6600T) / not specified (Core i7-4860EQ). The Core i5-6600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4860EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6600T targets Office. Direct competitor: Core i5-6600T rivals AMD Athlon II X4 640.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4860EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Office	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-6600T was priced at $213, while the Core i7-4860EQ came in at $434. On launch pricing ($213 vs $434), Core i5-6600T was $221 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6600T delivers 26.1 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-4860EQ — making the Core i5-6600T the 69.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-6600T	Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP	$213-51%	$434
Performance per Dollar	26.1+106%	12.7
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Core i5-6600T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4860EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.