Core i5-7287U vs Core i7-2670QM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7287U vs Core i7-2670QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7287U vs Core i7-2670QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7287U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2670QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,743 vs 3,748).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2670QM better than Core i5-7287U?

Yes. Core i7-2670QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2670QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2670QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2670QM still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2670QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7287U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7287U vs Core i7-2670QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7287U

The Core i5-7287U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,743 points. Launch price was $304.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7287U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2670QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7287U versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-7287U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-7287U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2670QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7287U scores 3,743 against the Core i7-2670QM's 3,748 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-2670QM. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7287U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM.

Feature	Core i5-7287U	Core i7-2670QM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,743	3,748

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7287U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2670QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Core i5-7287U versus 1600 on the Core i7-2670QM — the Core i5-7287U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-7287U) vs 16 (Core i7-2670QM) — the Core i7-2670QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-U (Core i5-7287U) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2670QM).

Feature	Core i5-7287U	Core i7-2670QM
Socket	BGA1356	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32	32
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Core i5-7287U) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2670QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7287U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.