PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7440EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,937 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +125.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 459.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-7440EQ?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 125.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 288.4% better Geekbench multi-core, 338.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 125.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 288.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 125.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 459.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 22.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of the older platform, 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7440EQ

The Core i5-7440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,711 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-7440EQ versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Core i5-7440EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7440EQ scores 5,711 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 125.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 892 vs 2,407, a 91.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,937 vs 11,408 (118.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-7440EQ vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4.6 GHz+59%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	20 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	5,711	25,029+338%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	892	2,407+170%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,937	11,408+288%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7440EQ versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-7440EQ) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,CM230 (Core i5-7440EQ) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Core i5-13400F
Socket	—	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	192 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-7440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440EQ targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440EQ rivals Ryzen Embedded V1605B; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7440EQ was priced at $250, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($250 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7440EQ delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 139.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$250	$196-22%
Performance per Dollar	22.8	127.7+460%
Release Date	2017	2023

Search Core i5-7440EQ on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.