PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7440EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 85W, a 40W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Xeon Bronze 3106 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,711 vs 5,753).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Bronze 3106

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌88.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Bronze 3106 better than Core i5-7440EQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7440EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Bronze 3106 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3106 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Bronze 3106 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon Bronze 3106 comes in 58.0% more expensive on MSRP at $395 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-7440EQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 56.8% better value on paper (22.8 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older DDR4-era platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7440EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7440EQ

The Core i5-7440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,711 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon Bronze 3106

The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-7440EQ versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Bronze 3106. The Core i5-7440EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7440EQ scores 5,711 against the Xeon Bronze 3106's 5,753 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3106. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-7440EQ vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	—	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	11 MB (total)+83%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,711	5,753
Geekbench 6 Single	892	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,937	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7440EQ versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — the Core i5-7440EQ supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3106 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-7440EQ) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3106). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-7440EQ) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3106) — the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,CM230 (Core i5-7440EQ) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3106).

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Socket	—	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+13%	2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3106 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-7440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440EQ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440EQ rivals Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7440EQ was priced at $250, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 came in at $395. On launch pricing ($250 vs $395), Core i5-7440EQ was $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7440EQ delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Bronze 3106 — making the Core i5-7440EQ the 44.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7440EQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP	$250-37%	$395
Performance per Dollar	22.8+56%	14.6
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Core i5-7440EQ on Amazon

Search Xeon Bronze 3106 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.