Core i5-7442EQ vs Processor N95

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7442EQ vs Processor N95 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7442EQ vs Processor N95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7442EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Processor N95 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Processor N95

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,783 vs 4,834).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7442EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor N95 better than Core i5-7442EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Processor N95 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7442EQ pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7442EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor N95 is the better buy right now. Processor N95 comes in $90 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-7442EQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 54.6% better value on MSRP (29.9 vs 19.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N95 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of the older platform. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-7442EQ vs Processor N95 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7442EQ

The Core i5-7442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,834 points. Launch price was $250.

Processor N95

The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7442EQ and Processor N95 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i5-7442EQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — a 47.3% clock advantage for the Processor N95. The Core i5-7442EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7442EQ scores 4,834 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-7442EQ. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-7442EQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N95.

Feature	Core i5-7442EQ	Processor N95
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+62%
Base Clock	—	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	4,834+1%	4,783
Geekbench 6 Single	728	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,387	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7442EQ) / not specified (Processor N95). The Core i5-7442EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Processor N95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7442EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i5-7442EQ	Processor N95
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7442EQ was priced at $250, while the Processor N95 came in at $160. On launch pricing ($250 vs $160), Processor N95 was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7442EQ delivers 19.3 pts/$ vs 29.9 pts/$ for the Processor N95 — making the Processor N95 the 42.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7442EQ	Processor N95
MSRP	$250	$160-36%
Performance per Dollar	19.3	29.9+55%
Release Date	2017	2023

Search Core i5-7442EQ on Amazon

Search Processor N95 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.