
Core i5-7442EQ

Xeon Bronze 3204
Core i5-7442EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3204 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7442EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3204 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7442EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3204: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7442EQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Xeon Bronze 3204 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3204 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3204, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3204 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Bronze 3204
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,797 vs 4,834).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7442EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7442EQ better than Xeon Bronze 3204?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7442EQ vs Xeon Bronze 3204 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7442EQ
The Core i5-7442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,834 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon Bronze 3204
The Xeon Bronze 3204 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,797 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7442EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3204 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i5-7442EQ versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3204 — a 10% clock advantage for the Core i5-7442EQ. The Core i5-7442EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7442EQ scores 4,834 against the Xeon Bronze 3204's 4,797 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-7442EQ. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-7442EQ vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3204.
| Feature | Core i5-7442EQ | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz+11% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 8.25 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 4,834 | 4,797 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 728 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,387 | — |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7442EQ versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3204 — the Core i5-7442EQ supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3204 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-7442EQ) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3204). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-7442EQ) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3204) — the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM175,HM175,CM238 (Core i5-7442EQ) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3204).
| Feature | Core i5-7442EQ | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+13% | 2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1024 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3204 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7442EQ) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3204). The Core i5-7442EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7442EQ targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Xeon Bronze 3204 rivals EPYC 7232P.
| Feature | Core i5-7442EQ | Xeon Bronze 3204 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













