
Core i5-7640X

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Core i5-7640X vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7640X vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7640X vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7640X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,060 vs 7,106).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌72.3% higher power demand at 112W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.6 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 112W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7640X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 better than Core i5-7640X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7640X vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7640X
The Core i5-7640X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 112 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,060 points. Launch price was $242.


Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-7640X and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-7640X versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-7640X (base: 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-7640X uses the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7640X scores 7,060 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7640X vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-X (2017) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 7,060 | 7,106 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,726 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,419 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,726 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7640X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-7640X) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300). Primary use case: Core i5-7640X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7640X was priced at $249, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($249 vs $110), Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7640X delivers 28.4 pts/$ vs 64.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 the 78% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $110-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4 | 64.6+127% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














