
Core i5-7640X

Xeon W3680
Core i5-7640X vs Xeon W3680 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7640X vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7640X vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7640X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $345 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 112W instead of 130W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3680, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W3680
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,060).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌16.1% higher power demand at 130W vs 112W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7640X better than Xeon W3680?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7640X vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7640X
The Core i5-7640X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 112 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,060 points. Launch price was $242.

Xeon W3680
The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7640X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-7640X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-7640X (base: 4 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i5-7640X uses the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7640X scores 7,060 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-7640X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7640X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+20% | 3.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-X (2017) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 7,060 | 7,025 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,726 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,419 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,726 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7640X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-7640X) / not specified (Xeon W3680). Primary use case: Core i5-7640X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7640X was priced at $249, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($249 vs $594), Core i5-7640X was $345 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7640X delivers 28.4 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Core i5-7640X the 82.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7640X | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $594 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+141% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














