Core i5-7Y57 vs A8-6500
Core i5-7Y57
A8-6500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-7Y57 is positioned at rank 1101 and the A8-6500 is on rank 474, so the A8-6500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7Y57
Performance Per Dollar A8-6500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-7Y57 | A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-7Y57 | A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7Y57 and A8-6500
Core i5-7Y57
The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.
A8-6500
The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-6500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 versus 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-7Y57 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A8-6500 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7Y57 scores 2,585 against the A8-6500's 2,598 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57 vs 0 kB on the A8-6500.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y57 | A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+192% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,585 | 2,598 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-6500 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y57 versus 1866 on the A8-6500 — the A8-6500 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-7Y57) vs 16 (A8-6500) — the A8-6500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y57 | A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | 1866+62100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+26214300% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57) vs true (A8-6500). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y57) and Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y57 | A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 8570D |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-7Y57 and A8-6500
