Core i5-8250U
VS
Core i7-3770S

Core i5-8250U vs Core i7-3770S

Intel

Core i5-8250U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-3770S

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8250U is positioned at rank 860 and the Core i7-3770S is on rank 691, so the Core i7-3770S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8250U

#848
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1415%
#849
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1395%
#850
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1280%
#851
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1274%
#852
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1263%
#854
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1219%
#855
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1169%
#856
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1167%
#857
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1136%
#860
Core i5-8250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12625%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11930%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8662%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2609%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2067%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1808%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1036%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1022%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
931%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
931%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
895%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
883%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
879%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
871%
#690
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
100%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#692
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
100%
#693
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#694
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
99%
#695
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
99%
#696
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
99%
#697
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#699
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#700
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#701
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
98%
#702
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#703
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
97%
#704
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
97%
#705
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8250U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8250UCore i7-3770S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3770S (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8250UCore i7-3770S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8250U and Core i7-3770S

Intel

Core i5-8250U

The Core i5-8250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,158 points. Launch price was $297.

Intel

Core i7-3770S

The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8250U and Core i7-3770S share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-8250U versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770S (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-8250U uses the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3770S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8250U scores 6,158 against the Core i7-3770S's 6,173 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3770S. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,127 vs 694, a 47.6% lead for the Core i5-8250U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8250U vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770S.

FeatureCore i5-8250UCore i7-3770S
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz+15%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
6,158
6,173
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,127+62%
694
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,303
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8250U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3770S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-8250U versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3770S — the Core i5-8250U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-8250U) vs 16 (Core i7-3770S) — the Core i7-3770S offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-R (Core i5-8250U) and Z77,H77,B75,Z68,P67,H67 (Core i7-3770S).

FeatureCore i5-8250UCore i7-3770S
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8250U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 620 (Core i5-8250U) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8250U targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i7-3770S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-8250U rivals Ryzen 5 2500U.

FeatureCore i5-8250UCore i7-3770S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Budget