
Core i5-8500

Xeon E5-2690
Core i5-8500 vs Xeon E5-2690 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-8500 vs Xeon E5-2690 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-8500 vs Xeon E5-2690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-8500
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $1,865 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- β Delivers 944.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.6 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2690 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (9,521 vs 9,764).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2690
2012Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +122.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 9 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 49.6 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- β107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2690 better than Core i5-8500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8500 vs Xeon E5-2690 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8500
The Core i5-8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017β2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $202.

Xeon E5-2690
The Xeon E5-2690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,764 points. Launch price was $397.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8500 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon E5-2690 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8500 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 β a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8500 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-8500 uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017β2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8500 scores 9,521 against the Xeon E5-2690's 9,764 β a 2.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2690. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8500 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690.
| Feature | Core i5-8500 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+8% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+3% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+122% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S (2017β2018) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 9,521 | 9,764+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8500 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8500 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 40 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-8500 was priced at $192, while the Xeon E5-2690 came in at $2057. On launch pricing ($192 vs $2057), Core i5-8500 was $1865 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8500 delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 β making the Core i5-8500 the 165.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-8500 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-91% | $2057 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.6+955% | 4.7 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














