Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4930K

Intel

Core i5-9400F

6 Cores6 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-4930K

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-9400F

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $488 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
  • Delivers 271.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-4930K

2013

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,462).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 52.0 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-9400F better than Core i7-4930K?
Yes. Core i5-9400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-9400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9400F is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-9400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-9400F is $488 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $670 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 271.4% better value on MSRP (52.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-9400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
1080p
low179 FPS168 FPS
medium144 FPS144 FPS
high115 FPS116 FPS
ultra91 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS141 FPS
medium122 FPS118 FPS
high96 FPS93 FPS
ultra75 FPS76 FPS
4K
low71 FPS64 FPS
medium61 FPS57 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra37 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
1080p
low237 FPS212 FPS
medium237 FPS186 FPS
high237 FPS171 FPS
ultra222 FPS139 FPS
1440p
low237 FPS189 FPS
medium237 FPS164 FPS
high226 FPS152 FPS
ultra202 FPS128 FPS
4K
low237 FPS163 FPS
medium216 FPS143 FPS
high196 FPS128 FPS
ultra170 FPS95 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
1080p
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium237 FPS234 FPS
high237 FPS234 FPS
ultra237 FPS234 FPS
1440p
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium237 FPS234 FPS
high237 FPS234 FPS
ultra237 FPS234 FPS
4K
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium226 FPS234 FPS
high192 FPS234 FPS
ultra152 FPS234 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
1080p
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium237 FPS234 FPS
high237 FPS234 FPS
ultra237 FPS234 FPS
1440p
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium237 FPS234 FPS
high237 FPS234 FPS
ultra237 FPS234 FPS
4K
low237 FPS234 FPS
medium237 FPS234 FPS
high237 FPS234 FPS
ultra237 FPS234 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9400F and Core i7-4930K

Intel

Core i5-9400F

The Core i5-9400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,462 points. Launch price was $182.

Intel

Core i7-4930K

The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.

Processing Power

The Core i5-9400F packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Core i7-4930K's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K — a 5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-9400F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4930K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400F scores 9,462 against the Core i7-4930K's 9,379 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-9400F. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K.

FeatureCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
Cores / Threads
6 / 6
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+5%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
9 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
9,462
9,379
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9400F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400F) / not specified (Core i7-4930K). Primary use case: Core i5-9400F targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-9400F launched at $182 MSRP, while the Core i7-4930K debuted at $670. On MSRP ($182 vs $670), the Core i5-9400F is $488 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9400F delivers 52.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4930K — making the Core i5-9400F the 115.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-9400FCore i7-4930K
MSRP
$182-73%
$670
Performance per Dollar
52.0+271%
14.0
Release Date
2019
2013