
Core i5-9400F

Core i7-4930K
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4930K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4930K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4930K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-9400F
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $488 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 271.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4930K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-4930K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,462).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 52.0 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-9400F better than Core i7-4930K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4930K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9400F
The Core i5-9400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,462 points. Launch price was $182.

Core i7-4930K
The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9400F packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Core i7-4930K's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K — a 5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-9400F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4930K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400F scores 9,462 against the Core i7-4930K's 9,379 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-9400F. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K.
| Feature | Core i5-9400F | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+5% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| PassMark | 9,462 | 9,379 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9400F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9400F | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400F) / not specified (Core i7-4930K). Primary use case: Core i5-9400F targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-9400F | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-9400F was priced at $182, while the Core i7-4930K came in at $670. On launch pricing ($182 vs $670), Core i5-9400F was $488 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9400F delivers 52.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4930K — making the Core i5-9400F the 115.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9400F | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-73% | $670 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.0+271% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














