
Core i5-9400T

Ryzen 5 7520C
Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen 5 7520C Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen 5 7520C FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen 5 7520C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-9400T
2019Why buy it
- β +0.9% higher PassMark.
- β +125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7520C needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7520C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7520C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520C moves to FT6 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7520C
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (8,104 vs 8,180).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 9 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-9400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7520C better than Core i5-9400T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen 5 7520C Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9400T
The Core i5-9400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,180 points. Launch price was $182.


Ryzen 5 7520C
The Ryzen 5 7520C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,104 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7520C offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i5-9400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-9400T versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7520C β a 23.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520C (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-9400T uses the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7520C uses Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022β2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400T scores 8,180 against the Ryzen 5 7520C's 8,104 β a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-9400T. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7520C.
| Feature | Core i5-9400T | Ryzen 5 7520C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total)+125% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 8,180 | 8,104 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7520C uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9400T | Ryzen 5 7520C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FT6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7520C). The Core i5-9400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 7520C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9400T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-9400T | Ryzen 5 7520C |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













