Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B

CPU

GPU

Core i5-9400T

6 Cores6 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B Performance Spectrum

Core i5-9400T

6 / 6

8,180

+0.9%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

4 / 8

8,107

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9400T

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,107 vs 8,180).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 9 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-9400T better than Ryzen Embedded V1756B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded V1756B is ahead with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9400T pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i5-9400T also has the bigger cache pool with 350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-9400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-9400T comes in $68 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Embedded V1756B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.6% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 32.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-9400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-9400T vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9400T

The Core i5-9400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,180 points. Launch price was $182.

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-9400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-9400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-9400T versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Core i5-9400T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400T scores 8,180 against the Ryzen Embedded V1756B's 8,107 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-9400T. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400T vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B.

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.25 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	9 MB (total)+350%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	8,180	8,107

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1756B). The Core i5-9400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9400T targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-9400T was priced at $182, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B came in at $250. On launch pricing ($182 vs $250), Core i5-9400T was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9400T delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — making the Core i5-9400T the 32.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP	$182-27%	$250
Performance per Dollar	44.9+39%	32.4
Release Date	2019	2018

Search Core i5-9400T on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded V1756B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.