Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 7320C

Intel

Core i5-9500T

6 Cores6 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 7320C

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Ryzen family

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 7320C Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 7320C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 7320C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9500T

2019

Why buy it

  • +125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Costs $107 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.2 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320C.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7320C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,095 vs 8,193).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320C moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 7320C

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 9 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 42.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-9500T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7320C better than Core i5-9500T?
Yes. Ryzen 3 7320C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 7320C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320C is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 7320C is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-9500T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 7320C comes in 55.7% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-9500T is also 53.9% better value on MSRP (42.2 vs 27.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7320C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 3 7320C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-9500T

The Core i5-9500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,095 points. Launch price was $192.

AMD

Ryzen 3 7320C

The Ryzen 3 7320C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,193 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-9500T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7320C offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-9500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-9500T versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320C — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320C (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-9500T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320C uses Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9500T scores 8,095 against the Ryzen 3 7320C's 8,193 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 7320C. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,236 vs 1,163, a 6.1% lead for the Core i5-9500T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9500T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320C.

FeatureCore i5-9500TRyzen 3 7320C
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
9 MB (total)+125%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
PassMark
8,095
8,193+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,236+6%
1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,218
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9500T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320C uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9500T versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320C — the Ryzen 3 7320C supports 106.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-9500T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-9500T) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320C) — the Core i5-9500T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 300-series (Core i5-9500T) and SoC (Ryzen 3 7320C).

FeatureCore i5-9500TRyzen 3 7320C
Socket
LGA1151
FT6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
LPDDR5-5500+106%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+700%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9500T) vs Yes (Ryzen 3 7320C). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-9500T) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 3 7320C) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9500T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-9500T rivals Ryzen 5 2600.

FeatureCore i5-9500TRyzen 3 7320C
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Radeon 610M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-9500T was priced at $192, while the Ryzen 3 7320C came in at $299. On launch pricing ($192 vs $299), Core i5-9500T was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9500T delivers 42.2 pts/$ vs 27.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 7320C — making the Core i5-9500T the 42.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-9500TRyzen 3 7320C
MSRP
$192-36%
$299
Performance per Dollar
42.2+54%
27.4
Release Date
2019
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.