
Core i5-9600K

Core i7-6800K
Core i5-9600K vs Core i7-6800K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-9600K vs Core i7-6800K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-9600K vs Core i7-6800K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-9600K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($263 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.5 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($263 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,645 vs 10,715).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 15 MB).
Core i7-6800K
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 9 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 40.5 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $263 MSRP).
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-9600K better than Core i7-6800K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-9600K vs Core i7-6800K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9600K
The Core i5-9600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,645 points. Launch price was $262.

Core i7-6800K
The Core i7-6800K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,715 points. Launch price was $345.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9600K packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Core i7-6800K's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600K versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-6800K — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-9600K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-6800K uses Broadwell-E (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9600K scores 10,645 against the Core i7-6800K's 10,715 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-6800K. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600K vs 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-6800K.
| Feature | Core i5-9600K | Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+21% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Broadwell-E (2016) |
| PassMark | 10,645 | 10,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9600K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6800K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9600K | Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-9600K) / not specified (Core i7-6800K). The Core i5-9600K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-6800K requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-9600K | Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-9600K was priced at $263, while the Core i7-6800K came in at $434. On launch pricing ($263 vs $434), Core i5-9600K was $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9600K delivers 40.5 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-6800K — making the Core i5-9600K the 48.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9600K | Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $263-39% | $434 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.5+64% | 24.7 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














